• Bland Agger posted an update 1 month, 1 week ago

    Let’s consider the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

    Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc’s server resources with other users.

    Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

    The rental type has the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

    However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

    There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.

    Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

    It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it’s a company.

    It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.

    Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.

    It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.

    If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

    OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

    By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company’s homepage and also the Webhard’s original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the solution.

    The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that may be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.

    It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.

    Rental vs. Construction.

    Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. p2p 순위 Which means that the utilization of web hard is becoming common.

    But it’s not just lately that this concept came out, and it’s true that it’s been a long time. When it came out, many people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn’t join it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.

    The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won’t adopt it.

    In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users’ needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.

    NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It’s a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.

    Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word “basic” implies, it isn’t a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it’s a very low-cost, very helpful solution that’s significantly less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.

    Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.